Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University ; (12): 621-627, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-837842

ABSTRACT

Objective To sum up our experience of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in an elderly critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patient with endotracheal intubation, providing references for the application of HBOT in COVID-19 treatment. Methods and results The patient was 87 years old male and presented coma symptoms on Feb. 3, 2020. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed multiple small flake fuzzy shadows in both lungs. The nucleic acid test of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was positive on Feb.5 and the diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed. After symptomatic and supportive treatment, the patient's condition became stable gradually, and the tracheal intubation was removed on Feb. 22. However, the patient was intubated again on Feb. 24 because of loss of coughing and sputum expelling abilities, and the patient's condition was judged to be critical. On Feb. 29, the patient received HBOT for the first time, and medical staff entered the hyperbaric oxygen cabin through the special channel. After HBOT for four times, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) of the patient tended to be stable, carbon dioxide retention was alleviated, liver and kidney function improved, and coagulation function recovered. On Mar. 6, SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin (Ig) test showed that SARS-CoV-2 IgM was negative and SARS-CoV-2 IgG was positive. The patient was then transferred to general wards. Conclusion HBOT can alleviate CO2 retention in critical COVID-19 patients, and has a positive effect on reducing hypoxia and protecting important organs. The HBOT infection control procedure is feasible, and the safety of medical staff can be guaranteed by reasonable design.

2.
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University ; (12): 596-603, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-837838

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the characteristics and related risk factors of myocardial injury in severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and their relationship with the prognosis. Methods The clinical data of severe and critical COVID-19 patients treated in General Hospital of Central Theater Command of PLA from Jan. 2020 to Mar. 2020 were collected. The patients were divided into non-myocardial injury group and myocardial injury group. The baseline data, clinical characteristics, auxiliary examination, treatment and prognosis were compared between the two groups, and the risk factors of myocardial injury and the effect on the prognosis of the severe and critical COVID-19 patients were analyzed. Results A total of 56 patients were included, with 22 in the non-myocardial injury group and 34 in the myocardial injury group. Patients were mostly male in both groups, and there was no significant difference in gender composition between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the non-myocardial injury group, the age of onset was significantly higher in the myocardial injury group (78.5[ 70.8, 89.0] years vs 56.5[ 50.3, 68.3] years, P0.05). For the CT findings of the lungs, the proportion of patients having patch-like/plaque-like shadows and ground-glass opacities was significantly greater in the non-myocardial injury group versus the myocardial injury group (72.7%[ 16/22] vs 38.2%[ 13/34], χ2=6.364, P0.05). Compared with the non-myocardial injury group, the levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, D-dimer, procalcitonin and IL-6 were significantly higher in the myocardial injury group (4 939.5[ 1 817.0, 9 450.3] pg/mL vs 612.5[ 301.0, 1 029.5] pg/mL, 4 386.5 [2 309.5, 9 635.3] ng/mL vs 850.5 [343.5, 2 333.8] ng/mL, 0.46 [0.23, 3.79] ng/mL vs 0.18 [0.13, 0.39] ng/mL, and 138.6 [41.9, 464.8] pg/mL vs 65.1[ 34.7, 99.3] pg/mL, respectively), and the differences were significant (all P0.05). The mortality rate was significantly higher in the myocardial injury than that in the non-myocardial injury group (58.8% [20/34] vs 9.1% [2/22], P<0.01). Patients who received tracheal intubation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and other invasive life support measures were all in the myocardial injury group. Conclusion Older age, male gender, coronary heart disease and (or) cardiac insufficiency, and elevated D-dimer, procalcitonin and IL-6 are the risk factors of myocardial injury in severe and critical COVID-19 patients. Myocardial injury can aggravate the condition and some patients need invasive circulating breathing support, with poor prognosis and high mortality. Therefore, the above indicators need to be observed more closely and dynamically and active treatment should be given according to related factors.

3.
Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University ; (12): 581-587, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-837835

ABSTRACT

Objective To sum up the clinical characteristics and chest computed tomography (CT) findings of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, and to explore the factors affecting the outcomes, so as to provide experience for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of severe and critical COVID-19. Methods The data of 25 severe and critical COVID-19 patients, who were treated in our hospital from Jan. 23, 2020 to Mar. 5, 2020, were collected. The clinical characteristics were retrospectively analyzed, and the clinical and laboratory indexes were compared between cured patients and uncured patients. The laboratory indicators of cured patients were further compared between the progressive and recovery stages. The chest CT findings of the patients were observed, and the lesion volume was quantified to assess the evolution of lung lesions using the CT image-based intelligent pneumonia lesion quantitative analysis software. Results There were 19 male and six female COVID-19 patients, and there were three deaths. The median age of 25 patients was 65 (63, 75) years old, and the body mass index (BMI) was 25.60 (23.51, 28.65) kg/m2. Twenty-two patients had a clear epidemiological history. Fever (22 cases) and cough (14 cases) were the most common first symptoms, and 18 patients had underlying diseases. Twelve patients were cured and discharged (median hospital stay was 25.5 d), and 13 patients were not cured, including three deaths and 10 cases with hospital stay>25 d with no remission. Compared with the uncured patients, the cured patients had significantly lower BMI, longer time from onset to progression to severe or critical illness, and higher CD4+T lymphocyte counts (all P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high CD4+T lymphocyte count was an independent protective factor for the cure and discharge of severe and critical COVID-19 patients (P=0.031). Compared with those in the progressive stage, the lymphocyte count and CD4+T lymphocyte count of 12 cured patients were significantly higher in the progression stage, and the C-reactive protein (CRP) level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and procalcitonin level were significantly lower (all P<0.01). Twenty-one patients received chest CT examination in the progressive stage; and all of them had multiple ground-glass opacities and consolidation shadows of the multiple-lobe lateral band and the dorsal side of bilateral lungs, 20 cases had pleural thickening, 9 cases had a small amount of bilateral pleural effusion, and 8 cases had mediastinal lymphadenopathy. The 12 cured patients received CT examination during the recovery period, and their lesions were all improved to different extents; some patients had irregular fiber grid shadows and stripe shadows; and the pleural thickening and pleural effusion were reduced to different extents. The quantitative analysis curves showed that lesion volume in the 12 cured patients obviously increased in the progressive stage and reduced in the absorption stage, showing an inverted V shape; and lesion volume in the uncured patients (nine cases received CT examination for two or more times) showed a rapid increase in the progressive stage. Conclusion Most severe and critical COVID-19 patients in Shanghai are older, with higher BMI and underlying diseases. Low BMI, slow disease progression, and high CD4+T lymphocyte count are beneficial to the improvement of COVID-19. The main findings of chest CT include multiple ground-glass opacities and consolidation shadows, mainly distributing in the lateral band and the dorsal side of lungs and mostly involving the pleura. The laboratory indexes, including the lymphocyte, CRP, CD4+T lymphocyte, ESR and procalcitonin, and chest CT examination play an important role in the diagnosis, disease monitoring and prognosis assessment of COVID-19

4.
Frontiers of Medicine ; (4): 232-248, 2020.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-827858

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious disease and a serious threat to human health. COVID-19 can cause multiple organ dysfunction, such as respiratory and circulatory failure, liver and kidney injury, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and thromboembolism, and even death. The World Health Organization reports that the mortality rate of severe-type COVID-19 is over 50%. Currently, the number of severe cases worldwide has increased rapidly, but the experience in the treatment of infected patients is still limited. Given the lack of specific antiviral drugs, multi-organ function support treatment is important for patients with COVID-19. To improve the cure rate and reduce the mortality of patients with severe- and critical-type COVID-19, this paper summarizes the experience of organ function support in patients with severe- and critical-type COVID-19 in Optical Valley Branch of Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China. This paper systematically summarizes the procedures of functional support therapies for multiple organs and systems, including respiratory, circulatory, renal, hepatic, and hematological systems, among patients with severe- and critical-type COVID-19. This paper provides a clinical reference and a new strategy for the optimal treatment of COVID-19 worldwide.


Subject(s)
Humans , Antiviral Agents , Therapeutic Uses , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Drug Therapy , Therapeutics , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Therapeutics , Respiration
5.
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae ; (6): 370-375, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-826354

ABSTRACT

To investigate the computed tomographc(CT)features of mild/moderate and severe/critical cases of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)in the recovery phase. Totally 63 discharged patients in Wuhan,China,who underwent both chest CT and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction(RT-PCR)from February 1 to February 29,2020,were included.With RT-PCR as a gold standard,the performance of chest CT in diagnosing COVID-19 was assessed.Patients were divided into mild/moderate and severe/critical groups according to the disease conditions,and clinical features such as sex,age,symptoms,hospital stay,comorbidities,and oxygen therapy were collected.CT images in the recovery phase were reviewed in terms of time from onset,CT features,location of lesions,lobe score,and total CT score. There were 37 patients in the mild/moderate group and 26 in the severe/critical group. Compared with the mild/moderate patients,the severe/critical patients had older age [(43±16) years (52±16) years; =2.10, =0.040], longer hospital stay [(15±6)d (19±7)d; =2.70, =0.009], higher dyspnea ratio (5.41% 53.85%; =18.90, <0.001), lower nasal oxygen therapy ratio (81.08% 19.23%;=23.66, <0.001), and higher bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation ratio (0 57.69%; =25.62, <0.001). Time from onset was (23±6) days in severe/critical group, significantly longer than that in mild/moderate group [(18±7) days] (=3.40, <0.001). Severe/critical patients had significantly higher crazy-paving pattern ratio (46.15% 10.81%;=4.24, =0.039) and lower ground-glass opacities ratio (15.38% 67.57%; =16.74, <0.001) than the mild/moderate patients. The proportion of lesions in peripheral lung was significantly higher in mild/moderate group than in severe/critical group (78.38% 34.61%; =13.43, <0.001), and the proportion of diffusely distributed lesions was significantly higher in severe/critical group than in mild/moderate group (65.38% 10.81%; =20.47, <0.001). Total CT score in severe/critical group was also significantly higher in severe/critical group than in mild/moderate group [11 (8,17) points 7 (4,9) points; =3.81, <0.001]. The CT features in the recovery stage differ between mild/moderate and severe/critical COVID-19 patients.The lung infiltration is remarkably more severe in the latter.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Betacoronavirus , China , Coronavirus Infections , Diagnostic Imaging , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Diagnostic Imaging , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
6.
Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases ; (12): E024-E024, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-819272

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the clinical features of critical cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods The clinical data of nine patients who were diagnosed with critical COVID-19 in Hainan General Hospital from January 21, 2020 to February 6, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. RT-PCR testing for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) was performed with multi-sites synchronize specimens including pharyngeal swab, blood, excrement, and urine. The serum levels of leucocyte, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and lactic acid between the improved group (five cases) and the deteriorated group (four cases) were compared. The t test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between groups. Results There were eight males (88.9%) and 1 female enrolled. The patients aged 28-77 years old, with an age of (52.9±18.0) years. By March 4, 2020, all five cases in improved group were cured and discharged, three cases in deteriorated group died and 1case remained in critical condition. All multi-sites specimens of patients in improved group turned negative in 2-4 weeks of illness onset, while those of cases in deteriorated group showed sustained viral nucleic acid positive (up to 48th day of illness onset). The white blood cell counts ((13.52±8.24)×10 9 /L vs (10.49±4.46) ×10 9 /L), C-reactive protein ((139.71±87.46) mg/L vs (78.60±55.40) mg/L) and procalcitonin ((2.32±4.03) ng/mL vs (0.28±0.58) ng/mL) , lactic acid ((3.70±4.14) mmol/L vs (2.33±0.53) mmol/L) in deteriorated group were all significantly higher than those in improved group ( t =2.908, 5.009, 4.391 and 2.942, respectively, all P <0.01). A rapid rise of serum IL-6 level up to 8 500 pg/mL was observed in one patient three days prior to death. Conclusion Among the patients with critical COVID-19, serum levels of inflammatory cytokines of the death cases are higher than those of improved and discharged cases.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL